Cancer-Causing Vaccines, Polio, AIDS, and Monkey Business
Polio Eradication Program, supported by the United Nation's World Health Organization (WHO), UNICEF, Rotary International,
and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC), is planning to immunize 74 million African children in 22 countries in the
coming months. The purpose is to stem a wild polio epidemic, the epicenter of which is oil-rich Nigeria, the most populous
country in Africa.
The vaccine program hit a snag last Fall when Islamic clerics in the predominantly
Muslim-populated areas of northern Nigeria claimed the WHO program was a plot by westerners to depopulate the area. Laboratory
tests revealed estrogen and other female sex hormones in the polio vaccine, proof that the vaccines were contaminated with
substances that could cause sterility. Furthermore, Nigerian officials became aware of internet reports suggesting the WHO
vaccine might be contaminated with HIV (the AIDS virus) and other cancer-causing viruses. African blacks are as suspicious
of government vaccines programs as American blacks. A 1990 survey of African-Americans in New York City showed 30% believed
AIDS is an ethno-specific bioweapon designed in a laboratory to kill black people.
Heymann, who heads the WHO eradication program, says the oral polio vaccine (which contains live but attenuated polio virus)
is completely safe. He blames Nigerians for exporting polio to surrounding nations.
the world's leading international health and science agency, is mired in power politics. For example, the Bush administration
now restricts communications between the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and WHO officials. A new HHS policy
requires the WHO to submit all requests for expert scientific advice to political officials at HHS who will then choose which
federal scientists will be permitted to respond. The new policy and two recent Administration decisions to withdraw federal
scientists from major international health conferences are part of a disturbing pattern of political interference in global
and the WHO
In March 2004, Haruna Kaita, a pharmaceutical scientist and Dean of Ahmadu
Bello University in Zaria, Nigeria, took samples of the controversial WHO's oral polio vaccine to India for analysis. Evidence
of serious vaccine contamination was found. According to a March 11, 2004 report on www.lifesite.net, Kaita was asked why drug manufacturers would contaminate the oral polio vaccine. He gave three reasons: "These manufacturers
or promoters of these harmful things have a secret agenda which only further research can reveal. Secondly they have always
taken us in the third world for granted, thinking we don't have the capacity, knowledge and equipment to conduct tests that
would reveal such contaminants. And very unfortunately they also have people to defend their atrocities within our midst,
and worst still some of these are supposed to be our own professionals who we rely on to protect our interests." Dr.
Kaita is demanding that "those who imported this fake drug in the name of Polio Vaccines- be prosecuted like any other
This is not the first time the WHO has been called on the carpet to explain their
surreptitious use of antifertility vaccines. Millions of female Mexicans, Nicaraguans and Filipinos were duped into taking
tetanus vaccines, some of which were laced with a female hormone that could cause miscarriage and sterilization. In 1995 a
Catholic organization called Human Life International accused the WHO of promoting this Canadian-made tetanus vaccine covertly
laced with a pregnancy hormone called human choriogonadotropic hormone (HCG). Suspicions were aroused when the tetanus vaccine
was prescribed in the peculiar dose of five multiple injections over a three month period, and recommended only to women of
child-bearing age. When an unusual number of women experienced vaginal bleeding and miscarriages after the shots, a hormone
additive was uncovered as the cause.
It is no secret that since the 1970's the WHO has been testing
and funding antifertility vaccine research that would make a woman's immune system attack and destroy her own babies in the
womb. In Geneva in 1989 the WHO sponsored a Symposium on Antifertility Vaccines and Contraceptive Vaccines.
Third-world women who received the laced tetanus shots not only developed antibodies to tetanus, but developed dangerous
antibodies to the pregnancy HCG hormone as well. Without HCG, growth of the fetus is impaired. Consequently, the WHO's vaccine
served as a covert and unsuspected contraceptive device. Commissioned to analyze the vaccine, the Philippines Medical Association
found that 20 percent of the WHO tetanus vaccines were contaminated with the hormone. The WHO has denied all accusations as
"completely false and without basis," and the U.S. media never reported on the controversy. For further details,
go to www.google.com and type-in "WHO + antifertility vaccine", or "Philippines + antifertility vaccine."
Following an eight month boycott, on June 24, 2004, the recalcitrant Nigerians agreed to resume polio vaccinations,
under the conditions the polio vaccine had to be manufactured in Indonesia and nowhere else.
The WHO and the Man-Made Theory of AIDS
Unlike most Americans, Africans are
aware of the man-made theory of AIDS, and the possibility that the WHO's extensive vaccine programs in Africa in the 1970s
are connected to the severe outbreak of AIDS in the early 1980s.
On May 11, 1987, The London
Times, one of the world's most respected newspapers, published an explosive article entitled, "Smallpox vaccine triggered
AIDS virus." The story suggested the smallpox eradication vaccine program sponsored by the WHO was responsible for unleashing
AIDS in Africa. Almost 100 million Africans living in central Africa were inoculated by the WHO. The vaccine was held responsible
for awakening a "dormant" AIDS virus infection on the continent.
An advisor to the
WHO admitted, "Now I believe the smallpox vaccine theory is the explanation for the explosion of AIDS." Robert Gallo,
M,D., the co-discoverer of HIV, told The Times, "The link between the WHO program and the epidemic is an interesting
and important hypothesis. I cannot say that it actually happened, but I have been saying for some years that the use of live
vaccines such as that used for smallpox can activate a dormant infection such as HIV." Despite the tremendous importance
of this story, the U.S. media was totally silent on the report, and Gallo never spoke of it again.
September 1987, at a conference sponsored by the National Health Federation in Monrovia, California, William Campbell Douglass,
M.D., bluntly blamed the WHO for murdering Africa with the AIDS virus. In a widely circulated reprint of his talk entitled
"W.H.O. Murdered Africa" , he accused the organization of encouraging virologists and molecular biologists to work
with deadly animal viruses in an attempt to make an immunosuppressive hybrid virus that would be deadly to humans. From the
Bulletin of the World Health Organization (Volume 47, p.259, 1972), he quoted a passage that stated: "An attempt should
be made to see if viruses can in fact exert selective effects on immune function. The possibility should be looked into that
the immune response to the virus itself may be impaired if the infecting virus damages, more or less selectively, the cell
responding to the virus." According to Douglass, "That's AIDS. What the WHO is saying in plain English is Let's
cook up a virus that selectively destroys the T-cell system of man, an acquired immune deficiency.'" The entire article
can be read on google.com ("WHO Murdered Africa").
In his 1989 book, AIDS:
The End of Civilization, Douglass claims the WHO laced the African vaccines. He blames "the virologists of the
world, the sorcerers who brought us this ghastly plague, and have formed a united front in denying that the virus was laboratory-made
from known, lethal animal viruses. The scientific party line is that a monkey in Africa with AIDS bit a native on the butt.
The native then went to town and gave it to a prostitute who gave it to a local banker who gave it to his wife and three girl
friends, and wham - 75 million people became infected with AIDS in Africa. An entirely preposterous story."
Indeed, in my two books on man-made AIDS - AIDS and the Doctors of Death: An Inquiry into the Origin of
the Epidemic (1988) , and in Queer Blood: The Secret AIDS Genocide Plot (1993), there is much evidence
to show that throughout the 1970s (the decade that preceded the AIDS outbreak in the U.S. and Africa) there was widespread
laboratory transfer of animal viruses, particularly primate/simian/monkey/chimpanzee viruses, by virologists. Various animal
viruses were pumped into different species of animals and into all sorts of cell cultures. This experimentation was undertaken
to find, create, and develop new cancer-causing and immunosuppressive viruses. It is these species-jumping laboratory primate
viruses that are the source of "human" immunodeficiency virus (HIV) - not the animals in the wild in Africa.
To researchers who believe whole-heartedly that AIDS is a man-made disease, the evidence is crystal clear that the
"primate ancestor virus of HIV" jumped species via contaminated vaccine programs, namely the extensive WHO-sponsored
vaccine programs in sub-Saharan Africa during the 1970's, and the experimental hepatitis B vaccine (1978-1981) that was injected
exclusively into gay men just prior to the outbreak of AIDS in America. (More on this later.)
Cancer-causing Monkey Viruses and the Polio Vaccine
Americans have been told
repeatedly that HIV/AIDS is the first time a monkey virus has jumped species to cause a new epidemic called AIDS. But the
rarely-publicized truth is that a cancer-causing monkey viruses jumped species a half century ago when contaminated polio
vaccines were given to millions of people on the planet, including half the U.S. population of that era.
In the early 1960's it was discovered that some lots of polio vaccines manufactured on rhesus monkey kidney tissue
during the period 1955 to 1963 were contaminated with a monkey virus called SV40 (Simian[monkey] virus #40). This primate
virus was quickly proven to cause various cancers in experimental animals. However, to this day, U.S. government officials
still insist there is no absolute proof that SV40 causes human cancer.
Despite the lack of government
interest in SV40 in human cancer for three decades, genetic and immunologic studies by independent researchers over the past
decade indicate this virus is clearly associated with human cancer, such as rapidly-fatal cancers of the lung (mesothelioma),
bone marrow cancer (multiple myeloma), brain tumors in children, and other forms of cancer.
Washington Times report (09/21/03) indicates "Some of the polio vaccine given to millions of American children from 1962
until 2000 could have been contaminated with a monkey virus that shows up in some cancers, according to documents and testimony
to be delivered to a House committee Wednesday. The vaccine manufacturer said such claims don't have any validity,' and the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) agrees. Documents set to be delivered to the House Subcommittee on Human
Rights and Wellness appear to show that the original "seeds" used to produce the Sabin [oral] vaccine could have
been tainted with SV40; that the company that manufactured the vaccine, Wyeth Lederle, may have used Rhesus monkeys -- which
are more likely to carry the disease -- rather than the African Green monkeys it says it used, according to company documents;
and that the company may not have performed all of the screening tests required."
P Kops is a lawyer who represents children and adults damaged by polio vaccines. He has documentation indicating that the
polio virus "seeds" from which the oral vaccine is made are still not proven to be free of SV40. In his article
entitled "Oral polio vaccine and human cancer: a reassessment of SV40 as a contaminant based upon legal documents",
appearing in the journal Anticancer Research (November 2000), Kops states: "In litigation involving the Lederle oral
polio vaccine, the manufacturer's internal documents failed to reveal such removal [of SV40] in all of the seeds. The absence
of confirmatory testing of the seeds, as well as testimony of a Lederle manager, indicate that this claim of removal of SV40
and the testing for SV40 in all the seeds cannot be fully substantiated. These legal documents and testimony indicate that
the scientific community should not be content with prior assumptions that SV40 could not have been in the oral polio vaccine.
Only further investigation by outside scientific and independent researchers who can review the test results claimed in the
January 1997 meeting and who can conduct their own independent evaluations by testing all the seeds and individual mono-valent
pools will assure that SV40 has not been present in commercially sold oral poliovirus vaccine manufactured by Lederle."
More than 600 million doses of polio vaccine were sold by Lederle from 1963 to 1999. On Jan.
1, 2000, the CDC recommended injections of an inactivated killed polio vaccine (IPV) that eliminates the risk of spreading
the disease, unlike the oral live polio vaccine that had been used for decades. This prompted Lederle to get out of the polio
vaccine business, and the last batch of Orimune was produced on Dec. 31, 1999.
For anyone who
still thinks that vaccine makers and government health officials are always your friend, I would highly recommend a just-published
book titled AIDS. The Virus and the Vaccine: The True Story of a Cancer-Causing Monkey Virus, Contaminated Polio Vaccine,
and the Millions of Americans Exposed, by Debbie Bookchin and Jim Schumacher. The book explores the history of the
polio vaccine, the contamination problems with SV40 , the ensuing vaccine-related cancer problems, and the government's cover-up
of the problem over the past three decades.
Few people realize how dangerous vaccines can be
and how complicated the process of vaccine manufacture really is, particularly when vaccines are made on living animal or
human cells. Contamination with bacteria and viruses and their elimination from the final product are constant problems during
the process. There are also recent suspicions that the laboratory media used to feed and nourish the cell cultures upon which
the virus is grown may also be a source of contamination. For further details on the dangers of vaccines, see "Are Vaccines
Causing More Diseases than they are Curing?" (www.whale.to/v/cantwell.html)
The Polio Vaccine/ Primate Virus Connection to African AIDS
In a 1,070 page book published in 1999, entitled The River: A Journey to the Source of HIV and AIDS,
Edward Hooper claims a 1950's polio vaccine made using monkey (and possibly chimp) kidneys, contained the ancestor virus of
HIV which now infects millions of Africans. Hooper's research greatly expands the polio vaccine man-made theory of AIDS first
reported by Tom Curtis in Rolling Stone magazine in 1992. When Curtis asked the ubiquitous David Heymann whether the 1950's
polio vaccine might have contributed to the outbreak, the WHO official declared: "The origin of the AIDS virus is of
no importance to science today. Any speculation on how it arose is of no importance." Quite an amazing response from
a man currently responsible for administering a possibly contaminated live oral polio vaccine to Africa's children.
Hooper's book got extensive press coverage, greatly upsetting the AIDS establishment which has always viewed any
suggestion of AIDS as a man-made disease as hysteria, paranoia or "conspiracy theory." Similarly, my two decades
of man-made AIDS research linking AIDS to 1970's vaccine, as well as two books on the subject, were dismissed by Hooper in
a sentence in a footnote on page 897.
Not surprisingly, Hooper's vaccine theory was totally discredited
the following year by AIDS scientists and WHO officials at a Conference held in London to debate the origin of AIDS, although
Hooper still actively promotes his theory on the internet. The retesting of the old 1950's polio vaccine showed no evidence
of a chimp virus. The molecular biologists also came down hard on Hopper with their "genetic sequencing data" suggesting
HIV first entered the human population in the 1930's. (For details, google "2000 London Origin of AIDS.")
Why it took HIV a half-century to produce an epidemic was not made clear, nor was there any discussion as to how
a black heterosexual African disease could have transformed itself exclusively into a white gay man's disease in Manhattan.
Or why the epidemic broke out first in America in 1979 and was only uncovered five years later in Africa.
Oral Polio Vaccine and Immunodeficiency
The public frequently receives bad
news about AIDS in Africa. Millions are dying, millions are infected with HIV, and millions of children are left as orphans.
And this is just the AIDS part of the various horrors connected with Africa.
why they are being given the oral form of the polio vaccine (OPV) when this form was removed from the market in America in
January 2000. The inactivated and killed polio virus vaccine (IPV) cannot cause polio, but the live OPV is indeed capable
of causing (although rarely) paralytic polio. Equally dangerous is that OPV recipients shed live polio virus, which is entirely
capable of spreading polio to unvaccinated and unprotected others. However, the oral form of the vaccine is the only form
recommended by health officials for outbreaks of polio epidemics.
Even if the IPV vaccine were
effective, the cost would be prohibitive. A 5cc. vial (enough to adequately inoculate 3 children with three separate injections)
is $US 300. Is this form of the vaccine totally safe? The expensive IPV is thought to contain newly-discovered nanobacteria,
which have been linked to various diseases. The Vaccine web site www.whale.to claims nanobacteria have been found to be a contaminant in previously assumed-to-be-sterile medical products, specifically
the IPV Polio Vaccine. Most human biologicals and vaccines are made in fetal bovine (cow) serum, a medium known to be contaminated
with nanobacteria, as reported May 23rd, 2001, at the 101st General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology.
Bad vaccine reactions are increased in the presence of HIV, immunodeficiency and malnutrition, which is purportedly
common in sub-Saharan Africans. So why is this not being considered? Will the WHO's live oral vaccine awaken more "dormant"
HIV? Nowhere could I find this question being asked by WHO officials or other scientists. The WHO vaccine for Africa (except
parts of Nigeria) is made by Aventis Pasteur, a multinational pharmaceutical company headquartered in France. In 2003 Aventis
donated 30 million doses to the program.
The Origin of AIDS and Monkey Business
A google search of the "origin of AIDS" lists an overwhelming 796,000 citations.
there are essentially three major theories of AIDS origin. The AIDS establishment believes unanimously in the "official"
monkey out-of-Africa theory. Second is Hooper's polio vaccine origin, now largely discredited or ignored. And third is the
never-discussed "conspiracy theory" that HIV was deliberately seeded into gay and black African populations as a
covert depopulation experiment with genocidal overtones.
Until 1999, it was widely believed that
the African Green Monkey was the source of HIV. This theory was highly touted by Robert Gallo, the world's most famous AIDS
researcher, who had done extensive animal virus research forcing ("jumping") primate viruses between species in
the Special Virus Cancer Program (1964-1980) in the years just before the AIDS outbreak. In 1975 Gallo reported on a "new"
and "human" HL23 virus, which eventually proved to be three contaminating ape viruses (gibbon-ape virus, simian
sarcoma virus, and baboon endogenous virus). Gallo claims he has no idea how these viruses contaminated his laboratory [Queer
Blood, p47]. For more information on pre-AIDS primate virus research, google "primate research + Special Virus
In 1999 there was renewed interest in the origin of AIDS. A media blitz
surrounded the finding of a team of researchers headed by Beatrice Hahn, M,D,, at the University of Alabama. Viral studies
on three African chimps in the wild, and on the corpse of a frozen chimp named Marilyn, found accidentally in a freezer at
Fort Detrick (the Army's biowarfare unit), all indicated a common subspecies of chimp was the animal source "most closely"
related to HIV. Hahn theorized the epidemic started when a hunter cut himself which butchering chimp meat and subsequently
became infected. For details, google "Beatrice Hahn + Marilyn".
Hahn is no stranger
to primate theories, having worked in Gallo's lab when he was heavily promoting the green monkey theory in the mid-1980's.
Her publicized 1999 AIDS origin research, based on genetic and molecular evidence, was quickly accepted as gospel by the AIDS
In 2003 she presented further details of her primate research, which was again
touted in the media. This time her findings were even more impenetrable (at least to me). The most popular origin of AIDS
web site (www.avert.org/origins.htm) summarizes Hahn's most recent findings in this way: "The findings of this 10-year long research into the origin and
evolution of HIV by Paul Sharp of Nottingham University and Beatrice Hahn of the University of Alabama were published in 2003.
They concluded that wild chimps became infected simultaneously with two simian immunodeficiency viruses (SIVs) which had viral
sex' to form a third virus capable of infecting humans and causing AIDS. Professor Sharp and his colleagues discovered that
the chimp virus was an amalgam of the SIV infecting red-capped mangabeys and the virus found in greater spot-nosed monkeys.
They believe that the hybridization took place inside chimps that had become infected with both strains of SIV after hunting
and killing the two smaller species of monkey."
American AIDS and the
Gay Hepatitis B Experiments (1978-1981)
Due to space requirements it is not possible
to give all the evidence pointing to AIDS as a man-made disease. However, a Google search of "man-made AIDS" lists
135,000 citations (not bad for a "conspiracy theory"!) and most of my published research on the subject can be found
on the internet ("alan cantwell + man-made AIDS").
It is my view that the origin of
AIDS cannot be determined without some reasonable (and not homophobic) explanation of how AIDS originated in America exclusively
in young, predominantly white, previously healthy gay men in Manhattan, beginning in 1979. To my knowledge, there is no evidence
to show that American AIDS originated in Africa. Furthermore, the virus "strain" of HIV in the U.S. is totally different
from African strains. This finding has led AIDS researcher Max Essex of Harvard (and co-discoverer of HIV) to suggest that
there may be two separate HIV-1 epidemics - one in which subtype B [the American strain] predominates and that is spread by
blood and homosexual sex, and a second involving the other HIV-1 subtypes and primarily vaginal sex [as seen in Africa]. (www.aegis.com/news/ads/1995/AD951870.html).
The onset of the "gay plague" and "gay cancer" (in the form of Kaposi's
sarcoma) are clearly associated with the hepatitis B vaccine trials which used young gay men as guinea pigs during the years
1978-1981. A few months after the first group of men were injected in the experiment in Manhattan at the New York Blood Center,
the first cases of "gay-related immune deficiency" were reported to the CDC. The experimental hepatitis B vaccine
was developed in chimpanzees, the animal species now thought to harbor "the ancestor of HIV."
Never mentioned by proponents of the chimp out-of-Africa theory is the fact that the New York Blood Center established
a chimp virus laboratory in West Africa in 1974. One of the purposes of VILAB II, at the Liberian Institute for Biomedical
Research in Robertsfield, Liberia, was to develop the human hepatitis B vaccine in chimps. The lab prides itself by releasing
"rehabilitated" chimps back into the wild.
Also closely allied to the "pre-AIDS"
development of the hepatitis B vaccine is the little publicized primate colony outside New York City called LEMSIP (the Laboratory
for Experimental Medicine and Surgery). Until disbanded in 1997, LEMSIP supplied New York area scientists with primates and
primate parts for transplantation and virus research. Founded in 1965, LEMSIP was affiliated with the NYU Medical Center,
where the first cases of AIDS-associated Kaposi's sarcoma were discovered in 1979.
of the stored gay men's blood from the hepatitis experiment at the New York Blood Center reveals that 6% of the men were HIV-positive
By 1981, the year the AIDS epidemic became "official", 20% of the men were
positive! By 1984, 40% were positive! This means that this group had a spectacularly higher rate of HIV than any group in
Africa during the same period - and at a time when AIDS cases were not even recognized or noted in Africa.
It is clear that there is overwhelming molecular and genetic evidence to tie SV40 related cancer cases to the SV40
contamination of polio vaccines. Yet government health officials refuse to accept this research on the grounds of "not
enough evidence" and "contamination problems" connected with SV40 testing (See Bookchin and Schumaker's book).
On the other hand, AIDS experts try to convince us that a molecular HIV test on a dried-up blood specimen taken from an unknown
black man in the Congo in 1959 is strong "proof" that human HIV cases existed in Africa back in 1959!! To me, the
explanation for this absurdity and inconsistency in science is simple: The government does NOT want people to question the
safety of vaccines, and it wants to blame Africans and African monkeys for a disease that is most likely caused by covert
primate virus contaminated vaccine experiments, that undoubtedly still continue to this day. For more documentation of covert
and unethical government-sponsored human experimentation , read In the Name of Science: A History of Secret Programs,
Medical Research, and Human Experimentation  by Andrew Goliszek.
accept the fact that HIV was "introduced" into gays, but do not publicize the fact that a second virus - the Kaposi's
sarcoma virus, also known as human herpes virus-8- was also introduced into gays at the time of the gay vaccine experiments.
Are two new viruses just another "accident of Mother Nature"?
Two decades after the
KS virus was "introduced" into gay men, it is now a permanent virus in the blood supply, which is beginning (like
SV40) to appear in association with certain cancers. Twenty percent of "healthy" Texas blood donors now carry antigens
to the KS virus in their blood. As many as 40% of Caribbean men with prostate cancer also carry the virus.
More details on the KS virus and the role of bacteria in KS cancer and other cancers can be found in "Acid-fast
Bacteria Discovered in Prostate Cancer" (www.rense.com/general53/acsaid.htm); and in my book The Cancer Microbe: The Hidden Killer in Cancer, AIDS, and other Immune Diseases.
It is clear to me that AIDS science is highly selective. Scientists who support the African origin of AIDS are heralded.
Scientists and researchers who support the man-made, laboratory origin of AIDS are ignored as "conspiracy theorists"
The Revenge of the Monkeys
scientists blame AIDS on promiscuity, homosexuality, dirty needles, drugs, air travel, etc,, but never once do they seriously
consider themselves responsible in any way for the AIDS holocaust. Scientists quickly obscured the primate virus origin of
AIDS by calling it the "human" immunodeficiency virus, a clever attempt to accentuate the "human" quality
rather than calling it by its real name -a simian (primate) immunodeficiency virus. Better to advise people to not transmit
a human virus, than to remind them they are spreading an animal virus of dubious origin.
altar of science the primate populations of Africa are dwindling to extinction. And the ultimate blame for AIDS is placed
on primates who cannot speak for themselves. Over the decades millions of animals have been sacrificed for their kidneys and
other organs to make vaccines which are now creating new plagues of incurable AIDS and cancer and new emerging diseases which
in turn demand more animal sacrifice to make more vaccines and drugs..
Monkeys, chimps, apes,
gorillas, and human beings are all classified as "primates." "Human primates" and "non-human primates"
share 99% of the same DNA. Yet, we treat them all as disposable beings, locking them up in increasingly large numbers as slaves
of science in animal gulags called "primate centers" for the sole purpose of using them and their children as hapless
As a physician, I am not against animal experimentation. However, I am against
foolish and excessive and dangerous animal experiments that expose millions, perhaps billions of people, to disease and death
from contaminated vaccines and insane biological warfare creations. I do not believe we can exterminate countless animals
for our selfish purposes without some sort of reckoning. What goes around, comes around.
the monkeys and the chimps get their revenge?. It's obvious it is already happening. AIDS is depopulating the planet. Mad
cow disease is a concern. SARS is yet another deadly emerging disease. The list goes on and on.
is no indication things will get better. Only worse. Isn't it time we get over our fantasy that slaughtering these animals
will somehow help us attain better health?.
Deadly HIV and SV40 virus from primates have already
co-mingled with our human genetic material, changing our collective gene pool forever.
more people will have to die as a result of our lab atrocities and our scientific ignorance? The more animals we kill for
science, the more people will die from "emerging" laboratory viruses. Admittedly this is a hard concept to understand
and accept when we have been conditioned to believe that abusing and killing animals for science is in our best interest.
Vaccines and Immune Suppression
Vaccines, all vaccines,
are immune suppressing; that is they depress our immune functions. The chemicals in the vaccines depress our immune system;
the virus present depresses immune function, and the foreign DNA/RNA from animal tissues depresses immunity. Toraldo, et al
found that the chemotaxis and metabolic function of PMNs (polymorphonuclear neutrophils) was significantly reduced after vaccinations
were given and did not return to normal for months. Other indicators of immune system depression included reduced lymphocyte
viability, neutrophil hyper-segmentation,
and a reduced white cell count. All vaccines are immune depressing
to some extent and that is the trade-off we are risking. The medical thought is that we trade a small immune depression for
an immunity to one disease. Now let me repeat, we are trading a total immune system
depression (our only defense against all known disease - including millions of pathogens)
for a temporary immunity against one disease, usually an innocuous childhood disease. Therefore,
the trade is not at all fair. Mullins puts it this way, "Are we trading mumps and measles for cancer and AIDS."
The trade-off is not worth the risk. We are risking getting many more diseases than we are "preventing"
from getting. [Later we will see that there is literally no prevention.] Another good example is the ritual of the yearly
flu shot. There may be only two or three varieties of flu viruses in each shot, hence the names "Asian-Flu", "Japanese-Flu"
"Indian-Flu" or "Swine-Flu". But there are literally thousands, may be millions of flu-causing viruses.
Taking one or two does not make sense and many people report getting the flu after taking a flu shot. We do not know which
variety of flu will affect us each year and in each locale. Therefore, the best method to avoid the flu is to strengthen our
immune system by eating properly and getting all the essential vitamins and minerals that our body needs. Only nutrition can
build and support a strong immune system, while vaccines help to tear our immunity down.
Vaccines have been linked to AIDS and other immuno-deficient disorders as well.
our body's immune functions and that keeps us open to developing many other diseases. It is very childish to think
that we are going to take one flu vaccine and never get sick from the many varieties of flu that exist, especially since viruses
can mutate so fast when the conditions arise. Keeping up with these fast mutating viruses can only be done by priming our
immune system with good nutrition and keeping the conditions/environment for their growth minimal. In other words, pathogenic
viruses will not grow where the conditions will not allow it. It is the terrain which dictates our health and not the germs/viruses
themselves. Germs are pleiomorphic, meaning that they can change with their environment; rods become cocci, and vice-versa.
Thinking that germs cause disease means that we are not responsible for our own health and we place that
responsibility in the hands of some one who has the means to kill these germs with toxic chemicals (drugs),
even if those drugs/vaccines harm our body. Vaccines prevent health!
reduce our immunity in many important ways:
1) Vaccines contain many chemicals
and heavy metals, like mercury and aluminum, which are in-themselves immuno-suppressing. Mercury actually causes changes in
the lymphocyte activity and decreases lymphocyte viability.
2) Vaccines contain foreign tissues and
foreign DNA/RNA which act to suppress the immune system via graft-vs-host rejection phenomena.
alter our t-cell helper/suppressor ratios ... just like those seen with AIDS. This ratio is a key indicator of a proper functioning
4) Vaccines alter the metabolic activity of PMNs and reduce their chemotaxic abilities.
PMNs are our body's defenses against pathogenic bacteria and viruses.
5) Vaccines suppress our immunity
merely buy over-taxing our immune system with foreign material, heavy metals, pathogens and viruses. The heavy metals slow
down our immune system, while the viruses set up shop to grow and divide. It is like being chained and handcuffed before swimming.
6) Vaccines clog our lymphatic system and lymph nodes with large protein molecules which have not been
adequately broken down by our digestive processes, since vaccines by pass digestion with injections. This is why vaccines
are linked to allergies, because they contain large proteins which as circulating immune complexes (CICs) or "klinkers"
which cause our body to become allergic.
7) Vaccines deplete our body of vital immune-enhancing nutrients,
like vitamin C, A and zinc, which are needed for a strong immune system. It is nutrients like these that primes our immune
system, feeds the white blood cells and macrophages and allows them to function optimally.
are neurotoxic and slow the level of nervous transmission, and communications to the brain and other tissues. Now we know
that some lymphocytes communicate directly with the brain through a complex set of neurotransmitters. Altering these factors
will also depress our immunity.
4) Links of Vaccines to AIDS -
the medical profession does not lightly discuss AIDS and vaccines in the same sentence, there is much evidence linking AIDS
to vaccines. Buttram and Hoffman state, "Indirect immunofluorescence evaluation of T-lymphocytes from blood samples taken
... after vaccination revealed a temporary drop ... in the helper/suppressor ratio after vaccination." What that means
is that immediately after vaccines are given our blood "looks" like the blood of and AIDS patient. AIDS is diagnosed
when the T -cell (helper to suppressor) ratios are depressed and vaccines cause that same occurrence. Now is it any coincidence
that the countries where AIDS is rampant most, are the same countries which received the most vaccinations? It is no joke
when one asks, "Are we trading mumps and measles for cancer and AIDS?"
When we look into
vaccine production we see the links of vaccines to monkey viruses, like SV-40, which causes immuno-deficiencies (similar to
AIDS) in monkeys. Some scientists feel that SIV and HIV are very similar viruses and may be one in the same. If it is found
in monkeys it is called SIV and if it is found in people it is then called HIV. Very likely, it is the foreign nature of SIV
which makes it deadly to our immune system and our immune system goes on the blink. Vaccinations and AIDS are clearly related,
and the medical literature shows us many links to AIDS. The first Hepatitis vaccines made were notorious for causing AIDS
and were made from the blood of the gay populations, who had high levels of hepatitis and AIDS. Links of AIDS to the hepatitis
vaccines were numerous in the medical literature at the time (the 1970s) of the first hepatitis vaccines and people were afraid
to take them for that reason. Yes, one may fear hepatitis, but we also had a greater fear of AIDS, which was more deadly and
serious a condition, although many more people experienced hepatitis each year.
Many other views of
how vaccines started the AIDS epidemic are available, but none can be proven with any degree of certainty. Whether HIV is
a disease similar to the SIV found in monkey, remains to be seen. Is SIV and HIV the same virus? Is SV-40 involved in immuno-suppression
and immunodeficiency? There were reports of the smallpox vaccines delivered to Haiti, Brazil and Africa containing HIV by
the London Times in 1987. Some persons have taken conspiratorial views of AIDS, but none have surfaced with any degree of
veracity and it misses the point ... all vaccines are immuno-suppressive and compromise the host's immunity. Whether they
contain actual HIV viruses may be disputable, they will depress the immune system. Today more care is taken
in vaccine production and there are better methods of locating and removing contaminant viruses, but vaccines are still dangerous
from their humble beginning and set the stage for many other diseases to follow suit many years later.
True Immunity: Where Does it Come From? Nutrition!
Science has glossed over the most
valuable point of health, ... nutrition. What is it that boosts our immune system and gives one a vibrant healthy life? ...
nutrition. What is it that allows one to over -come the most devastating diseases known to mankind? ... Nutrition. What is
the key factor for the recovery of disease? ... Nutrition. What is needed for the body to heal itself? ... Nutrition. What
key factor prevents disease? ... Nutrition. What is missing from allopathic medicine today? ... Nutrition! It is nutrition
and only nutrition which boosts our immune system and helps the body defend itself from foreign pathogens. Herbs, foods, nutrients
and vitamin supplements are the tour-de-force of our immunity and it is virtually ignored by medical science in favor of drugs
One can speculate many reasons why medical science has chosen to ignore this most important
aspect of our health ... perhaps, because there is no profit in broccoli and carrots. But regardless of profit there is a
side of science that altruistically searches for truth. Herbalists and naturopaths for centuries have cured devastating diseases
with nature's remedies and proper diet. Medicine has shunned diet and nutrition (and herbs) as not having a place in scientific
medicine. But the lowly herb can cure more than an equal share of allopathic man-made (synthetic) drugs which although originally
came from many herbs are now toxic according to their dose and must be tightly regulated.
paths of allopathic medicine and herbal naturopathic remedies is seen in the philosophy of vaccination. Vaccines are the only
way modern medicine has to "prevent" disease for they don't believe in or use herbs or nutrition. Therefore, toxic
vaccines are their only tool to "promote health". Herbalists and naturopaths, on the other hand, see the person
with a totally different point of view and understanding. The person is taught how to live with nature, how to eat naturally
and how to not create the environment for pathogens to grow. When the body is periodically cleansed, disease is not a problem.
Allopathy desires to force health by giving the body more toxins (vaccines) to deal with in a futile and erroneous attempt
at "preventing" disease. Yet, vaccines cause illnesses, many diseases, numerous disorders and set
the stage for cancerous grow while depressing our body's ability to fight off pathogens. Allopathy depresses
important body functions, while making the body more toxic. Naturopathy helps the body eliminate toxins while
supporting the body's immune functions.
Therefore, there are many points in which allopathic medicine
and naturopathic medicine diverge and differ. Yet, the laws of our land only allow allopathic methods (vaccinations) of disease
"prevention" and not other more effective and less damaging methods of prevention, i.e., homeopathy and naturopathy.
Many religions refuse vaccines on religious grounds, because vaccines are contrary to their beliefs and vaccines are blood
products grown on aborted fetuses and human and animal tissues. Vaccines grown on animal tissues, aborted fetuses, and cancer
cells would be against anyone's fair judgement and common sense, regardless of religious beliefs. Therefore, it is common
sense which mandates our opinions against putrid vaccines, as well as religious beliefs.
It is no secret
anymore that proper nutrition builds good immunity, when the medical literature is full of studies on the intimate details
of our immunity as related to nutrients. The fact that nutrition plays a large role in one's health (and immune functions)
can no longer be suppressed by prejudice. The over-whelming science today substantiates nutrition as a key factor in our health.
Nutrition boosts our immune system like nothing else can. Field stated, "it is accepted that nutrition is important in
the development and function of the immune system." Harbige noted that "Nutrition and nutritional status can have
profound effects on immune functions, resistance to infection and auto-immunity in man and other animals." Scrimshaw
and SanGiovanni state that "infections, ... have adverse effects on nutritional status. ... Conversely, almost any nutrient
deficiency, if sufficiently severe, will impair resistance to infection." Chandra (Am J Clin Nutrition, 1997; 66(2):460s-463s)
also noted, "Nutrition is a critical determinant of immune responses and malnutrition is the most common cause of immunodeficiency
worldwide." Chandra and Chandra (Prog Food Nutrition Sci, 1986;10(1-2):1-65) stated that "the immune system plays
a key role in the body's ability to fight infection and reduce the risk of developing tumors, autoimmune and degenerative
Yet, although this information is new to us now, it is not new to everyone. Many people
have always maintained that a strong immune system began with good nutrition. Roger Williams, Linus Pauling, Ewan Cameron,
Adelle Davis, John R Christopher, Jethro Kloss, and many other notable nutritionist have claimed nutrition was important to
our health for many years, but were ignored. Profit of man-made chemicals came before the health of the patrons, many asked
to suffer needlessly in the name of science when they could have been cured by a simple herbal remedy or a food. Nutrition
has been down-played in the last 80 years in favor of patent-able drugs (man-made chemicals). Perhaps, the penicillin era
was the greatest cause of the downfall of nutrition as a part of our health. The search for the magic bullet began with Paul
Erlich's compound 606, and continues to this day. We think that cancer must be cured from without by a man-made chemical,
while we ignore the inner terrain and the body's natural innate abilities (to heal) within ... governed, of course, by nutrition.
Hopefully within the next decade great strides will be taken in nutrition and health to make up for lost time. Many physicians
are learning nutrition and herbology and homeopathy on their own time. Their patients will be the better for it. As more nutritional
oriented physicians become available, the people will have a choice and a place to turn to when in need. Nutrition Produces
Health and Vitality! Vaccines Prevent Health!
6) Vaccines and Cancer -
never saw cancer in an un-vaccinated person."
Dr W B Clarke,
We don't usually associate vaccinations with cancer, but there are many citations in the
medial literature where vaccines caused cancers. Sometimes cancer occurred at the site of injection and sometimes a lymphatic
type of cancer would occur many years later in locations. Vaccines cause cancer. Yes, not everybody gets cancer after receiving
a vaccine, but their body has been seeded with the ingredients for cancer to grow. Picture cancer as a window of opportunity.
Once that window is opened, cancer can grow. Dr Vincent's work with Biologic Terrain Assessment (BTA) found that all children
were pushed into the cancer "window" after vaccines were given. Now those children who don't develop cancer were
(obviously) able to negate that cancer "window" with good nutrition. It is the environment which allows cancer to
grow in the first place, and vaccines create that environment. When the cancer is at the site of the vaccine injection, it
is hard to deny a causal relationship. Miraculously, doctors tell their patients it is co-incidental or unrelated to the vaccines.
Yet, it was known in the 1800s that vaccines clog our lymphatics and contain toxic materials which
could lead to disease, even cancers. Even Jenner himself had trouble with his vaccines causing diseases, and death. He was
nearly lynched in one town for his specious concoctions. Our lymphatic system is designed to carry our lymphocytes throughout
our body and maintain control over our cellular immunity. Therefore, the injection of large molecular sized proteins (foreign
tissues in the vaccines) will clog our lymph-nodes and create problems for the lymphatic system. Therefore, it is no mystery
that vaccines and lymphatic diseases, like leukemias and lymphomas, are related.
scrofula, cancer, erysipelas and almost all diseases of the skin, have been conveyed, occasioned, or intensified by vaccination."
Dr William Hitchman
"Cancer and other vile diseases are daily inflicted on virtuous families by
Dr Edward Haughton, BAMD, MRCS
"Experts say 98 million
Americans who took polio shots in the 1950s and 1960s may get a deadly brain cancer from the inoculations ... Researchers
at the University of Chicago Medical Center say that a virus contaminated the polio vaccine and they have now found genetic
material from the virus in a number of brain cancer victims."
Dr Jacob Rachlin quoted from Weekly
World News of Lantana [FL]
Of course, anything which depresses our immunity will eventually lead to
cancer, since it is our immune system which cleanses and eliminates mutated (cancerous) cells from our body daily. If this
is not done, cancers will grow and develop unchecked by our immune system. Therefore, a healthy immune system is needed to
protect us from cancer and Vaccines Prevent Health.
Vaccines and Auto-Immune Disease - [The
injection of foreign animal DNA/RNA.]
Auto-immune disease is common-place today, but were very rare
just a few years ago. Does anybody wonder why one day we are healthy and the next day our body no longer recognizes our own
cells as self? Could the injection of foreign animal DNA/RNA have anything to do with our epidemic rise in auto-immune disease
today? Bart Classen, MD has done some remarkable research on vaccines and auto-immune diseases, especially Diabetes mellitus,
which he sees as a marker disease for all auto-immune conditions. His research finds that the more that vaccinations are given
the more diabetes (and auto-immune diseases) appears. Dr Classen's research found that this held true for many animal models;
after receiving vaccines they experienced increases in diabetes. Then he carried his research to include vaccinated human
populations. He found that in retrospective studies of vaccinations in five different human populations, this fact held true
also. The more vaccines one received the more was their incidence of diabetes (and auto-immune diseases).
it is interesting that the increases in diabetes included Juvenile-onset diabetes, which we are told today is a profoundly
"genetic" disease. Yet, Dr Claussen's studies revealed that vaccinations [any vaccination] can cause increases in
Juvenile-onset diabetes, too. Now one theory said that the antigenic structure of the measles/mumps virus was similar to the
antigenic structure of the beta cells (which produce insulin) in the pancreas. So when our body makes antibodies to fight
off measles virus, those antibodies attack the pancreatic beta cells, too. Viola diabetes!
create the foundations for auto-immune disease when foreign animal tissues are injected into our blood streams. It alters
our genes ("jumping" genes) and creates havoc in our lymphatic system. Auto-immune conditions are more common today
than before massive vaccination programs began in the 1940s. Auto-immune conditions such as ALS, MS, RA, and Diabetes are
severe diseases and not to be taken lightly. They alter people's lives for ever and cost more than money when we consider
the time involved, the stress involved, and eventually death ensues. There is even some speculation that auto-immune conditions
may be behind the brain conditions they see in autism and there is some talk in the medical literature of auto-immunity to
brain cells. If the body can not even recognize its own cells, then it has been tricked into thinking that those cells are
no longer self. Why does this occur? Could AIDS be an auto-immune condition where the lymphocytes are reacting against each
other? What about the myriad of neurological disorders, kidney disorders, blood disorders and the many diseases associated
with vaccinations? When we are looking for excellent health, we need to avoid auto-immune disorders. One must remember that
Vaccines Prevent Health!
Why people insist to have these
contaminates injected into their bodies and the bodies of their children is beyond perplexing. ANYONE can go to a library
look in the ‘Physicians Desk Reference’. It CLEARLY states… NO VACCINE IS TESTED
FOR CARCINOGENS OR CANCER. Shame on medical professionals who ‘claim’ vaccines in NO WAY can cause cancer!
Any HONEST physician who practiced prior to the rise in vaccines given will tell you that to find a child with cancer prior
to rise in vaccine distribution was like finding a leprechaun with a couple of four leaf clovers in each hand. Anyone claiming
kids always got cancer like they do today (if even ever) are either delusional or flat out liars. So the trade from measles
to cancer was “for the greater good”? A triumph in health? One of the medical marvels of all time? Yeah, perhaps
it is for those who are into eugenics and population control.
Also the children of the oral polio vaccine era (which
contained the SV 40 cancer virus) were the MOST cancer ridden generation when they all reached their 40′s and 50′s
W.B. Clarke was NOT the only Doctor to note that cancer was a non issue until vaccines came along. They won’t teach
in medical school that this was THE general consensus in the medical community hands down. That is, unless you were a doctor
on the Rockefeller pay roll. Like the Flexner’s were. The super eugenicists Rockefeller, Carnegie and Harriman families
had to get control of the medical institutions in the U.S. BEFORE the INDEPENDENT medical establishment could expose the TRUE
purpose of vaccination as a ‘perfect’ population control tool hidden behind a BIG lie as a ‘revolution’
in science to benefit all of mankind and shut it down completely. The eugenicists did just that, by using the Rockefeller
controlled ‘Flexner Report’ to FORCE ‘independent medical institutions to join college universities in order
for them to get funding thus killing the ‘truly’ independent medical schools OUTSIDE of super eugenicists Rockefeller
influence. I have long stated that a NEW ‘Flexner Report’ needs to be created by, OUTSIDE of the system, professionals
on today’s ‘Pharmacological Industrial Medical Complex’ run and controlled by todays eugenicists starting
with the ‘Genome Institute’.
At the end of this article is a gem of statement… THE GOOD
NEWS: Childhood cancer has been called the “modern medical miracle” because such remarkable progress has
been made in curing infants, children, teenagers, and young adults with cancer. Evil posing as good ALWAYS cranks
out statements like the above. It’s exactly like when Bill Gates boasted at the TED conference that Vaccines are a population
control tool that benefits mankind.
WAIT A SECOND! When the cancer rates in children were going off the charts in the
U.S. starting in the mid to late 1980′s EVERYONE WAS ASKING…”WHY ARE SO MANY KIDS GETTING CANCER TO BEGIN
WITH?” THAT is MY answer to the cancer EPIDEMIC beginning and end!
No amount of brian washing by the establishment
and the mindless do-gooders who can’t ask one simple question should get you into believing childhood cancer is a “modern
medical miracle”. I mean are we really this dumbed down?
In the early 1900s an astute Indiana physician, Dr. W.B. Clarke, stated “Cancer was practically unknown until
compulsory vaccination with cowpox vaccine began to be introduced. I have had to deal with two hundred cases of cancer, and
I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person.”
1 Mullins Eustace Murder by Injection pg 132 The National
Council for Medical research, P. O. Box 1105, Staunton, Virginia 24401
3 de Melker HE, et al Pertussis in the Netherlands:
an outbreak despite high levels of immunization with whole-cell vaccine Emerging Infectious Diseases 1997; 3(2): 175-8 Centers
for Disease Control
In 1954 Dr. Bernice Eddy (bacteriologist) discovered live monkey viruses in supposedly sterile inactivated
polio vaccine developed by Dr. Jonas Salk. This discovery was not well received at the NIH and Dr. Eddy was demoted. Later
Dr. Eddy, working with Sarah Stewart, discovered SE polyoma virus. This virus was quite important because it caused cancer
in every animal receiving it. Yellow fever vaccine had previously been found to contain avian (bird) leukemia virus. Later
Dr. Hilleman isolated SV 40 virus from both the Salk and Sabin polio vaccines. There were 40 different viruses in these
polio vaccines they were trying to eradicate. They were never able to get rid of these viruses ontaminating the polio vaccines.
The SV 40 virus causes malignancies. It has now been identified in 43 % of cases of non-Hodgekin lymphoma , 36 % of brain
tumors , 18 % of healthy blood samples, and 22 % of healthy semen samples, mesothiolomas and other malignancies. By the
time of this discovery SV 40 had already been injected into 10,000,000 people in Salk vaccine. Gastric digestion inactivtes
some of SV 40 in Sabin vaccine. However, the isolation of strains of Sabin polio vaccine from all 38 cases of Guillan Barre
Syndrome GBS in Brazil suggests that significant numbers of persons are able to be infected from this vaccine. All 38
of these patients had received Sabin polio vaccine months to years before the onset of GBS.
The incidence of non-Hodgekin
lymphoma has”mysteriouly” doubled since the 1970s. Dr. John Martin, Professor of Pathology at the Univ. of Southern
California, was employed by the Viral Oncology Branch of the Bureau of Biologics (FDA) from 1976 to 1980. While employed there
he identified foreign DNA in the live polio vaccine Orimune Lederle that suggested serious vaccine contamination. He warned
his supervisors about this problem and was told to discontinue his work as it was outside the scope of testing required for
Later Dr. Martin learned that all eleven of the African green monkeys used to grow the Lederle polio
virus Orimune had grown simian cytomegalovirus from kidney cell cultures. Lederle was aware of this viral contamination as
their Cytomegaloviral Contamination Plan clearly showed in 1972. The Bureau of Biologics decided not to pursue the matter
so production of infected polio vaccine continued.
In 1955 Dr. Martin identified unique cell destroying viruses termed
stealth viruses in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. These viruses lacked genes that would enable the immune system
to recognize them. Thus they were protected by the body’s failure to develop antiviral antibodies. In March of 1995,
Dr. Martin learned that some of these stealth viruses had originated from African green monkey simian cytomegalovirus of a
type known to infect man.
In the March 4, 1977 issue of Science Jonas and Darrell Salk warn, “Live virus vaccines
against influenza or poliomyelitis may in each instance produce the disease it intended to prevent. The live virus against
measles and mumps may produce such side effects as encephalitis (brain damage).
An Indiana physician, Dr. W.B. Clarke, made an astute observation about vaccines in the early 1900s. Dr. Clarke
stated that "Cancer was practically unknown until compulsory vaccination with cowpox vaccine began to be introduced.
I have had to deal with two hundred cases of cancer, and I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person." (1)
This strongly suggests that something about the process of vaccination injures the immune system, permitting cancer to get
An additional problem contributing to
the development of cancer is now occurring. Sloppy isolation techniques have caused widespread viral contamination of the
animals used to create vaccines. The Salk vaccine for polio contained 40 viruses that were never able to be eradicated. (2)
This vaccine contained SV40 virus known to cause malignancies. SV 40 has been identified in 43% of cases of non-Hodgkin lymphoma,
36.5% of brain tumors, mesotheliomas and other malignancies. The Salk vaccine had been given to more than 10,000,000 persons
when this discovery was made. Yellow fever vaccine has been found to contain avian (bird) leukemia virus. (3)Administration of vaccines is not a natural phenomena. The Arthur Research Foundation
in Tucson, Arizona estimates that up to 60% of irreplaceable immature immune cells from the thymus gland are exhausted by
the mass immunization programs now given to US children. The development of natural immunity from disease only uses up 10%
of these vital immune cells. Perhaps the loss of these critical immune cells is the reason for Dr. Clarke's observation that
only vaccinated persons develop cancer.Bibliography(1.) Mullins Eustace, Murder by Injection, pg 132. The National Council for Medical
Research, P.O. Box 1105, Staunton, Virginia 24401.(2.)
Horowitz, Leonard G. Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola, pg 484.(3.) Harris RJ et al. Contaminant viruses in two live vaccines produced in chick cells. J Hyg (London) 1966 Mar:
64: 1-7.James A. Howenstine, MDc/o Remarsa USA SB 37P.O.
Florida 33102-5292 USA011-506-2627504Jimhow@racsa.co.crCOPYRIGHT 2004 The Townsend Letter Group COPYRIGHT 2004 Gale Group
Vaccines Causing More Disease Than They Are Curing? Alan Cantwell, Jr., M.D.
Vaccines help keep us safe from infectious diseases. Smallpox and polio epidemics have
been wiped out by mass vaccine programs. People rush to get flu shots every fall, and kids are bombarded with
a barrage of 22 required vaccinations before the age of six. Even pets need their shots. The manufacture of vaccines
is a giant industry and what you pay for inoculations and doctor visits is big business for pediatricians, family practitioners
and veterinarians. So why are more and more people worried about vaccines, especially the ones for kids?
Vaccine-induced Illness Barbara Loe Fisher, president of the National Vaccine Information Center,
a consumer's group based in Vienna, Virginia, claims vaccines are responsible for the increasing numbers of children
and adults who suffer from immune system and neurologic disorders, hyperactivity, learning disabilities, asthma, chronic
fatigue syndrome, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and seizure disorders. She calls for studies to monitor
the long-term effects of mass vaccination and Fisher wants physicians to be absolutely sure these vaccines are safe
and not harming people.
No one can
deny the dangers of vaccines. The measles, mumps, rubella (German measles) and polio vaccines, all contain live
but weakened viruses. Although health officials tell you that polio has been wiped out in the U.S. since 1979, they
often fail to mention that all recorded cases of polio since that time are actually caused by the polio vaccine.
Vaccine investigator Neil Z. Miller questions whether we
still need need the polio vaccine when it causes every new case of polio in this country. Before mass vaccinations programs
began fifty years ago, Miller insists we didn't have cancer in epidemic numbers, that autoimmune ailments were barely
known, and childhood autism did not exist.
Vaccine Contamination There is also the problem of contamination that has always plagued vaccine makers. During World War
II a yellow fever vaccine manufactured with human blood serum was unknowingly contaminated with hepatitis virus and
given to the military. As a result, more than 50,000 cases of serum hepatitis broke out among American troops injected with
In the 1960s it was discovered
that polio vaccines manufactured in monkey kidney tissue between 1955 and 1963 were contaminated with a monkey virus (Simian
Virus, number 40). Although this virus causes cancer in experimental animals, health authorities insist it does not
cause problems in humans. But evidence of SV40 genetic material has been popping up in human cancers and
normal tissue. Researchers are now connecting SV40-contaminated polio vaccines to an increasing number of rare
cancers of the lung (mesothelioma) and bone marrow (multiple myeloma). In a 1999 report, SV40 DNA was detected
in tissue samples from four children born after 1982. Three were kidney transplant patients, and a fourth had a kidney
tumor. Could SV40 be passed on from parents to their children? No one knows for sure.
Covert Vaccine Experiments Using kids as guinea pigs in potentially harmful vaccine experiments is every parents' worst
nightmare. This actually happened in 1989-1991 when Kaiser Permanente of Southern California and the Centers for Disease Control
(CDC) jointly conducted a measles vaccine experiment. Without proper parental disclosure, the Yugoslavian-made "high
titre" Edmonston-Zagreb measles vaccine was tested on 1,500 poor, primarily black and Latino, inner city
children in Los Angeles. Highly recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO), the high-potency experimental
vaccine was previously injected into infants in Mexico, Haiti, and Africa. It was discontinued in these countries when it
was discovered that the children were dying in large numbers.
Unbelievably, the measles vaccine caused long-term suppression of the children's immune
system for six months up to three years. As a result, the immunodepressed children died from other diseases in greater numbers
than children who had never received the vaccine. Tragically, African girl babies in the experiment were given twice the dose
of boys, and therefore suffered a higher death rate. The WHO pulled the vaccine off the market in 1992.
the E-Z measles vaccine tested by Kaiser on minority babies was supposed to increase immunity in younger infants. Instead,
the vaccine produced the opposite effect. A Los Angeles Times editorial (June 20, 1996) assured readers that "none
of the 1,500 was injured by the unlicensed vaccine" and called upon the CDC to ensure that experiments like the E-Z measles
vaccine could never occur again.
One wonders how many secret vaccine experiments are conducted by health
authorities that never come to the attention of the public. During the two-year measles experiment I was employed
by Kaiser and I never knew anything about it until I read the report in The Times five years later, in 1996.
In the poor inner cities across the country the number of asthma cases is exploding and health officials don't
know why. According to the CDC, 5000 asthma deaths occur annually; and it is estimated that 17.3 million people (4.8
are children) suffer from the disease, up from 6.7 million in 1980. Asthma usually begins before age 6, and blacks are two
to three times more likely to die from asthma than whites. In the Bronx and Harlem sections of New York City, the hospitalization
rate for asthma is 21 times higher than in the more affluent areas of the city.
Could the sharp rise in asthma
in poor children be connected with immunosuppression caused by by a barrage of vaccines, as well as a lack of quality
medical care and insurance, poor diet, and environmental factors?
The possible connection of immunosuppressive
vaccines to diseases like asthma has never been raised by health officials .
With vaccine experiments frequently
performed in Africa and now on black Americans, no wonder one out of every four African-Americans believes
AIDS was developed as a genocide program by the U.S. government to exterminate the black population.
experiments in the 1990s have not been limited to blacks. Millions of female Mexicans, Nicaraguans and Filipinos have
been duped into taking tetanus vaccines, some of which contained a female hormone that could cause miscarriage and sterilization.
In 1995, a Catholic human rights organization called Human Life International accused the WHO of promoting a Canadian-made
tetanus vaccine laced with a pregancy hormone called human choriogonadotropic hormone (HCG). Suspicions were aroused when
the tetanus vaccine was prescribed in the unusual dose of five multiple injections over a three month period, and recommended
only to women of reproductive age. When an unusual number of women experienced vaginal bleeding and miscarriages after
the shots, a hormone additive was uncovered as the cause.
Apparently the WHO has been developing and testing
anti-fertility vaccines for over two decades. Women receiving the laced tetanus shot not only developed antibodies to
tetanus, but they also developed dangerous antibodies to the pregnancy hormone as well. Without this HCG hormone the growth
of the fetus is impaired. Consequently, the laced vaccine served as a covert contraceptive device. Commissioned to analyze
the vaccine, the Philippines Medical Association found that 20 percent of the WHO tetanus vaccines were
contaminated with the hormone. Not surprisingly, the WHO has denied all accusations as "completely false and without
basis," and the major media have never reported on the controversy. For futher details on this issue, consult the
Human Life International website (www.hli.org).
Newly approved vaccines may also pose serious risks. In October 1999 a vaccine against
"rotavirus" infection (which causes most cases of childhood diarrhea) was pulled off the market. One
year after the RotaShield vaccine was inoculated into over a million infants, it was found to increase the risk
of bowel obstruction. Almost 100 cases of bowel obstruction were reported to the government, and twenty infants developed
bowel obstructions within one or two weeks after receiving the vaccine.
Vaccine Manufacture and Associated Dangers Althogh the public has heard about side effects of vaccines, most people are clueless
about the manufacture of vaccines. Few people know that viruses used in vaccine production need to be grown on
animal parts like monkey kidneys, or in chicken embryos, or in human and fetal "cell lines." Harvesting
viruses in human cell-lines can be perilous because some human cell lines are derived from cancer cells.
In AIDS & The Doctors of Death I wrote about
the development of the first human "HeLa" cell line - an "immortal" cell line used extensively in
cancer and vaccine research for decades. Henrietta Lacks was a young black woman from Baltimore who died from a highly
malignant cervical cancer in 1951. Small pieces of her tumor were donated to a laboratory specializing in tissue cell culture.
In those days most attempts to grow human cells outside the body failed. But for some unknown reason Henrietta's cancer cells
grew vigorously and became known as the first successful human tissue cell line in history - the now famous
HeLa cell line commemorating the legendary HEnrietta LAcks.
Henrietta's cells were kept alive by feeding
them a witches' brew of beef embryo extract (the ground-up remains of a three-week-old, unborn cattle embryo); fresh chicken
plasma obtained from the blood of a live chicken heart; and blood from human placentas (the placenta is the sac that
nurtures the developing fetus and contains powerful hormones).
It is now suspected that a sexually-transmitted
papilloma virus is the cause of cervical cancer. And it is anybody's guess how many other chicken, cattle, and human viruses
are incorporated into the HeLa cell line, but none of this possible viral contamination seems to bother scientists who
have extensively used the cells in cancer research. What laboratory scientists did eventually discover was that HeLa
cells proved so hardy that they frequently contaminated other tissue cell lines used in cancer and cancer virus
In the late 1960s when widespread HeLa cell contamination problems were uncovered, scientists
were shocked and embarrassed to learn that millions of dollars worth of published cancer experiments were ruined. "Liver
cells" and "monkey cells" that were used in cancer experiments turned out to be Henrietta's cancer cells in
disguise. Benign cells which supposedly "spontaneously transformed" into malignant cells were found to be
cells contaminated with cancerous HeLa cells.
The serious problem of HeLa cell contamination in cancer and vaccine
research is revealed in Michael Gold's A Conspiracy of Cells: One Woman's Immortal Legacy and the Medical Scandal
It Caused. Even Jonas Salk, who developed the legendary Salk polio vaccine, was fooled when HeLa cells contaminated
his animal cell lines. He admitted this years later in 1978 before a stunned audience of cell biologists and vaccine makers.
In experiments performed in the late 1950s on dying cancer patients, Salk tried injecting them with a cell line
of monkey heart tissue - the same cell line he used to harvest polio virus for his famous vaccine. He hoped the monkey cell
injections would stimulate the immune system to fight cancer. However, when abcesses developed at the site of injections Salk
began to suspect that he might be injecting HeLa cells rather than monkey cells, and he stopped the experiment.
Mark Nelson-Rees, a HeLa cell expert and one of the 1978 conference attendees, offered to test Salk's line if it was
still available. Salk graciously agreed and the monkey cells indeed proved to be HeLa cells which had invaded and taken over
the monkey cell line. According to author Gold, Salk thought there were adequate ways to separate viruses from the tissue
cell lines they were harvested in, so that it really didn't matter what kind of cells were used. Even if vaccines
weren't filtered, and even if whole cancer cells were injected directly into a human, Salk believed they would be rejected
by the body and cause no harm. In those days doctors didn't much believe in cancer-causing viruses. Nowadays, no researcher
would dare try injecting cancer cells into a human being. But in the 1950s Salk had done it accidently. He had injected
HeLa cells into a few dozen patients and it hadn't bothered him a bit.
Is There a Vaccine Contamination Connection to AIDS?
Most people assume vaccines are
"sterile" and germ free. But sterilizing a vaccine can destroy the necessary immunizing protein that makes it work.
Thus, contaminating viruses or viral "particles" can sometime survive the vaccine process.
Animal viruses are also contained in fetal calf serum, a blood product
commonly used as a laboratory nutrient to feed various tissue cell cultures. Vaccine contamination by fetal calf serum and
its possible reationship to HIV was the subject of a letter by J. Grote, published in the Journal of the Royal (London) Society
of Medicine in October 1988. Bovine visna virus (which looks similar to HIV) is a known contaminant of fetal calf serum
used in vaccine production and virus-like particles have been detected in vaccines certified for clinical use. Grote warns
that "It seems absolutely vital that all vaccines are screened for HIV prior to use, and that bovine visna virus
is further investigated as to its relationship to HIV and its possible role in progression towards AIDS ."
Could virus-contaminated vaccines lie at the root of AIDS? A few researchers, including myself, who believe
HIV was "introduced" into gays during the experimental hepatitis B vaccine trails when thousands of homosexuals
were injected in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and New York, during the years 1978-1981.
The AIDS epidemic
first erupted in gays living in those cities in 1981. In 1980, one year before, already 20% of the gays inoculated
in Manhattan with the experimental vaccine were already HIV-positive. This was several years before definite AIDS cases were
diagnosed in Africa. In the early 1970s the hepatitis B vaccine was developed in chimpanzees, now wildly accepted as
the animal from which HIV supposedly evolved.
Hepatitis B vaccine was developed to protect people from the sexual spread of the hepatitis B virus. Now the government
recommends that all newborn babies be given the vaccine. Such recommendations do not make sense to many parents. And people
are still fearful of the hepatitis B vaccine because of its original connection to gay men and AIDS. The original experimental
vaccine was made from the pooled blood serum of hepatitis-infected homosexuals and, as mentioned, serum-based vaccines
cannot be sterilized.
of AIDS is that HIV originated from polio vaccines contaminated with chimp and monkey viruses, and administered to Africans
in the late 1950s. In The River: A Journey to the Source of HIV and AIDS , published in 1999, Edward Hooper details
how polio vaccine was made using monkey (and possibly chimp) kidneys and how the ancestor virus of HIV
could have jumped species (via the vaccine) to produce the outbreak of AIDS in Africa. Hooper's well-researched book
greatly expands the polio vaccine theory of AIDS first reportedby Tom Curtis in Rolling Stone magazine in
1992, and The River is a must-read for anyone interested in the possible man-made origin of AIDS.
Other researchers think it more likely that the various WHO-sponsored
vaccine programs (particularly the smallpox program) in Africa in the 1970s are responsible for unleashing AIDS in Africa
in the 1980s. Hooper, who has worked as a United Nations official, has discounted the research pointing to AIDS as a
man-made disease, as proposed by Dr. Leonard Horowitz in Emerging Viruses, and in my two books AIDS & The Doctors of Death:
An Inquiry into the Origin of the AIDS Epidemic: and Queer Blood: The Secret AIDS Genocide Plot.
Horowitz and I both suspect contaminated smallpox vaccines as the source of HIV
In Africa. Certainly the smallpox (vaccinia-cowpox) virus is an excellent virus to use for the genetic engineering of new,
multipurpose vaccines. By splicing into the DNA genes of the vaccinia virus, scientists can add on parts of disease-producing
viruses like influenza, hepatitis, and other viruses. The safety of this technique has not been fully evaluated,
prompting one vaccine maker at a Vaccinia Virus Workshop in 1984 to ask if this could lead to another form of AIDS.
The Vaccine Connection to Gulf War Illness and Huntsville Mystery Illness The cause of
Gulf War Illness (GWI) is unknown. For years this debilitating illness (which now affects one-half of the Gulf War vets)
has been ignored by Pentagon officials who claim the disease does not exist and that vets are simply reacting
to stress. GWI is also thought to be contagious. Vets insist their disease has been passed on to spouses, other family
members, and even pets.
suspect multiple vaccines, particularly the experimental anthrax vaccine, are implicated in the disease. Currently,
soldiers who refuse to take the mandatory anthrax vaccine are being courtmartialed and dismissed from the service.
Researchers Dr. Garth Nicolson and his wife Nancy have
found a tiny bacterial microbe (a "mycoplasma") in the blood of nearly half the ill vets with GWI. Amazingly,
this infectious agent has a piece of HIV (the AIDS virus) attached to it. This microbe could never have occured
naturally. On the contrary, the composition of the microbe suggests a man-made and genetically-engineered biological
Garth Nicolson's scientific
credentials are impeccable. For 16 years he was a professor of medicine at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
in Houston, as well as professor of pathology and laboratory medicine at the University of Texas Medical School, also
in Houston. Nancy Nicolson, a molecular biophysicist, was on the faculty at Baylor College of Medicine.
Six months after returning home from the Gulf war, the Nicolson's
daughter contracted GWI. Her mother Nancy had contracted a similar illness in 1987 when she was working with Mycoplasma
incognitus in infectious disease research. Finally suspecting that this research had biowarfare implications, Nancy
Nicolson became a whistle-blower and angered officials. As a result, she believes she was deliberately infected with the mycoplasma.
After partial paralysis and a long illness, she finally regained her health with the antibiotic Doxycycline.
The Nicolson's discovery of a similar mycoplasma (but
without the attachment of HIV) in a mysterious illness that erupted in the Huntsville, Texas area among prison guards and
their families has all the drama of a The Movie of the Week. Although the Huntsville disease broke out in the late 1980s (shortly
before the Gulf War), it has many of the same signs and symptoms of GWI. Many locals are convinced the sometimes deadly disease
originally spread from prisoners incarcerated in several large prisons around Huntsville.
In experiments conducted during the 1970s and 80s, the prisoners were
inoculated with flu vaccines containing genetically engineered viruses and mycoplasma . It is suspected that vaccines
were being covertly developed and deployed as biological warfare weapons. Nobel prize winner James Watson, world famous
for his discovery of the molecular structure of DNA and a leading researcher of the still ongoing Human Genome Project,
was involved in these prison experiments. The guards are convinced the Huntsville mystery illness is intimately connected
to these experiments, jointly conducted by the Medical School and the military. Like GWI, health officials deny the
The Nicolsons continue
to developed antibiotic treatments, which have helped some vets. But they have paid a heavy price for their controversial
research and unprecedented discoveries. Garth Nicolson was forced to resign from M.D. Anderson in 1996. His career and
reputation destroyed, the Nicolsons have since moved to California and head The Institute for Molecular Medicine in Huntington
Dangerous Animal and Human Cell Lines in Vaccine Manufacture In an effort to quell concerns about the safety of vaccines, scientists are finally taking another
look at the "non-infectious" particles of bird-cancer viruses (avian leukosis virus) in the mumps/measles/rubella
vaccines routinely given to kids. Could this be the reason the FDA held a meeting in September, 1999,
to reconsider using human tumor cell lines (like HeLa) rather than monkey kidneys and chicken embryos which are no longer
guaranteed 100% safe?
in Science, Gretchen Vogel admits public trust in vaccines is a bit shaky. In Wales anti-vaccine parents are holding "measles
parties" to infect their children with the disease rather than vaccinate them. She cites the danger of using immortal
cell lines for live vaccine production because cancer genes or other hazardous factors might be transferred to people
receiving vaccines. But manufacturers also realize vaccine critics are becoming more wary of vaccines made in animal and bird
tissue. And vaccine makers want to use immortal cell lines to grow their viruses because obviously viruses can't grow on their
The big question everyone seems to avoid
is: Can vaccines cause cancer? There is certainly evidence connecting contaminated vaccines to AIDS. And HIV is
a cancer-causing virus. Robert Gallo, the co-discoverer of HIV in 1984, has clearly stated AIDS is an epidemic of cancer.
Animal and avian viruses can contaminate vaccines and
have all been studied as cancer-causing agents. And cancer and vaccine research would be much more difficult without
the use of cell lines, some of which are derived from cancer.
Vaccines and Public Paranoia Is the fear of vaccines justified? It is clear that vaccines can be dangerous. The contamination
of vaccines is a reality, and vaccine experiments can be hazardous to one's health. AIDS, unknown two decades ago, is
now an increasing worldwide epidemic with millions of death predicted for the next decade. Could vaccines contaminated with
cancer-causing and immunosuppressive viruses unleash new plagues in the New Millennium? If so, the new plagues
may be far worse than the diseases we eradicated by vaccine programs in the twentieth century.
"Anti-diarrheal vaccine for babies recalled," Los Angeles Times, October 16, 1999. Butel JS,
Arrington AS, Wong C, et al.: Molecular evidence of simian virus 40 infections in children. J Infect Dis 180:884-887,
1999. Cantwell A: AIDS & the Doctors of Death. Aries Rising Press, Los Angeles, 1988. Cantwell A: Queer Blood.
Aries Rising Press, Los Angeles, 1993. Gold M: A Conspiracy of Cells. State University of New York Press, Albany, 1986.
Hooper E: The River: A Journey to the Source of HIV and AIDS. Little, Brown and Company, Boston,
1999. Horowitz L: Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola. Tetrahedron, Inc, Rockport, MA, 1996. Jaroff Leon: "Vaccine
Jitters," TIME, September 13, 1999. Likoudis P: "Gulf war illness probe to advance with new study,"
The Wanderer, January 21, 1999. "Measles, government and trust " (Editorial), Los
Angeles Times, June 20, 1996. Miller NZ: Immunization: Theory vs Reality. New Atlantean Press, Santa Fe, 1996. Miller NZ: Immunizations: The People Speak! New Atlantean Press, Santa Fe, 1996. Quinnan GV: Vaccinia
Viruses as Vectors for Vaccine Antigens. Elsevier, New York, 1985. Stolberg SG: "Poor fight baffling
surge in asthma," New York Times, October 18, 1999.
The bottom line is this
..: The human body "WILL HEAL"... If we get out of our own way and allow it, it heals itself. It is our basic nature.
Anybody who tells you other than that is trying to sell you something. No matter what you have been told. Don't give up on
yourself and don't buy into the lines like ... ‘oh well you've had a good life'... 'at your age'... and the worst of
all ...'there's nothing further I can do, I suggest you finalize your affairs'... How dare anyone tell you to give up! So
much in society combines to convince us of the propaganda that some things never get better. It's up to you ... do you want
to get better? Make things better? It is human nature to make things better, evolve and grow.”-Shé D'Montford,
You are visitor number
These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. The products
and information contained herein are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any diseases or, medical problems.
It is not intended to replace your doctor's recommendations. The information is provided for educational purposes only. Nutritional
benefits may vary from one person to another.